Various ESB Casts discussion.

I would love to see the back panels because it makes no sense to me to remove lots of paint details for just a small "hair".
I can think of two reasons straight off the bat.
1. The paint detail in this area appears relatively light in the layering compared to other areas, i.e. what is more objectionable.
2. It's a clear tell on the lineage of the helmet. Whomever cast the helmet would know it had the bristle and call someone out at which point they would have to instantly holler UNCLE!
 
It still makes no sense to me, I would try to remove the bristle without modifying the paint tells so It would be easier to pass as a G2 than one with the entire back sanded.

I can't see the hard work sanding just a small bristle, maybe I am too good at sculpting :lol:
 
I would love to see the back panels because it makes no sense to me to remove lots of paint details for just a small "hair".

Yes, I got that point, I'm just interested seeing pictures of it (the left back panel with sand marks), as I have not seen any.

What it boils down to is this, KaanE : You have stepped up to bat for MF in just about every thread he or I have posted regarding any of this. If he is truly the vendor of integrity that you believe him to be, you should be able to acquire pictures of these areas directly from him. You should not have to rely on a 3rd party to acquire those pictures. Coming from any source other than him will come off as biased information, which is simply not the case.
 
I choose no sides. I'm just trying to be an objective viewer with hopes to understand why everything is made (from either side). Probably you do not like my wording because it's in confilct with your subjective opinion, as well as minute didn't like it a few times as I'm well aware of this.

Trust me, I bought a helmet from MF before the RS was released and because you were not willing to sell yours without the ears, I asked through PM to WF too. I was told it had no sand marks and decided to go for it becuase WF's was cleaned and no one told me it was a recast. If it has those sand marks, belive me I'll be the first making a thread here about lies.
 
I can't see the hard work sanding just a small bristle, maybe I am too good at sculpting :lol:

None of these recasts have required actual sculpting. The recast, the fugly, the "fan sculpt" "zero lineage" ROTJ have zero sculpting involved. It's all sanding, bondo and adding some inaccurate battle damage.
 
I choose no sides. I'm just trying to be an objective viewer with hopes to understand why everything is made (from either side). Probably you do not like my wording because it's in confilct with your subjective opinion, as well as minute didn't like it a few times as I'm well aware of this.

I do not care about your wording. I am telling you if you want pictures of a recast you should ask the person selling the recast.
 
Well, I got pictures of the master moulded by MF and there were paint details as well as no sanding marks on the left back panel. I'll corroborate this once I get my cast, but it will take a while because of USPS and Covid.
 
It still makes no sense to me, I would try to remove the bristle without modifying the paint tells so It would be easier to pass as a G2 than one with the entire back sanded.

I can't see the hard work sanding just a small bristle, maybe I am too good at sculpting :lol:
The level of detail on that area of that panel looks so fine that you'd have to be Michelangelo to take that hair out and make sure that the tiny detail went back in. It looks to me like there's hardly any relief to it at all.
 
The level of detail on that area of that panel looks so fine that you'd have to be Michelangelo to take that hair out and make sure that the tiny detail went back in. It looks to me like there's hardly any relief to it at all.

57bc90d5c461881e308b45b1.jpg
 
This thread is more than 4 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. This thread hasn't been active in some time. A new post in this thread might not contribute constructively to this discussion after so long.
If you wish to reply despite these issues, check the box below before replying.
Be aware that malicious compliance may result in more severe penalties.
Back
Top