RamSkirata
Active Hunter
Disney should hire you as costume builder!
Thanks! Though I'd much prefer them hire me for my actual profession.Disney should hire you as costume builder!
I agree, it's not an easy decision.I've been debating sacrificing my vintage squeegee....![]()
I can tell you're a scholarI agree, it's not an easy decision.
TL;DR:
There are at least two approaches to the debate... there is 1) safekeeping/collecting/hoarding: the desire to have the object itself, not for the costume, but for safe keeping of it's historical value to the process behind the making of the costume. To keep it safe from destruction, as if an endangered species (the rarer the part the more this applies, but only to the degree to which the original object must be irrevocably altered to use on the costume). Conversely, 2) original purpose/purism: the reason one desires to possess such an uncommon thing in the first place is for the sake of recreating the costume in its most accurate state possible, and therefore it should serve the costume as a priority, a contingency for its possession. The problem is when you want to feed both of these simultaneously. There is an inverse square relationship between the rareness of the object and your bank account. The rarer the object, the less money you have for it (usually squared). Of course when objects are so hard to find that finding even one is considered a miracle, then the tendency is to gravitate toward approach #1, (hoarding). The plus to that approach is when you get bored with it you can sell it later and get your money back. Maybe even make more back than the inflation rate (when hoarding becomes collecting). But that feat requires a rational pattern of thinking. A rarity in this hobby.
Awesome, those look great. The color is on point.So then, paint. I went through a whole lot of mixes to come up with something better than I used last time. In the end, I went back to what I used last time. SAC bomber green mixed with light gray. Seemed to work better than anything else I can conjure up. And easier.
View attachment 244641
View attachment 244642
I took everything off the left gauntlet just to make it easier, but I kept most parts on for the right. This was to try to replicate some of the masking errors on the original.
for instance, below, masking off the whipcord housing with good old fashioned Scotch masking tape, I intended to get that white spot at the tip which I was not even aware of the first time I did my ESB gauntlets...
View attachment 244643
View attachment 244644
And this was the result, as expected. It's not rocket science.
View attachment 244645
from reference:
View attachment 244646
There are other various details like this elsewhere. Nothing big.
And also, masking the whipcord like this keeps the inside around the stylus brush rod nice and supertrooper white as well...
View attachment 244647
Notice the white is a different tone than the white on the whipcord. The whipcord white is warmer... that's from the dark brown wash which you slather on the whole gauntlet except that recess inside the whipcord because you can't reach it when trying to get this prop finished in time to get it to the production stage by 7am the next morning and you really don't even care.
View attachment 244648
View attachment 244649
these marks around the switches on the right gauntlet were something else I missed on my first set of gauntlets.
View attachment 244650
I could be wrong but I came to the conclusion they are not silver paint, they're too bright, but tool marks where the paint has been scraped down to the plastic, presumably with a tool that tightened the nuts on the switches into place. So I made similar marks by scraping away the paint.
View attachment 244651