Star Wars Chick
Sr Hunter
Looks awesome Robert! :love back at ya!
Last edited by a moderator:
Robert, you're right the ones I sent you are a little too big, the new ones are .5" in height, but PM me on the height of those stripes and the space you are working with between them and I'll send you some new ones.
DarthVader1 wrote:
Guys, just an update of the pics I posted earlier in this thread...I have the pics of the tank tops now posted there.
I'm using a new clear masking on these which have a little less tac, the ones Mirax H got, and they are much easier to apply, but you'll still have to make sure that all the little pieces are on your JP as you peel off the masking.About Eli's statement, please guys, have just a little patience, cause believe me or not, this decals are not a joke to apply...much less are in the making process.
Guys, in behalf of Eli, this is the most difficult job someone in this forum could ever have, even more work than painting or assembling a Fett armor which is just cut, sand, prime, and paint...but this is precise, calmed, patient, and accurate...just in quantities and really small! Just my 2 cents!
DarthVader1 wrote:
VashDstampede wrote:
OK, after doing a little bit of looking through the ref. cd here's what I've seen:
On BB's MoM pics of the jet-pack there are 6 symbols:
1)middle of the left tank top
2)middle of the right tank top
3)top right of the main tank
4)bottom left of the main tank (white section)
5)bottom right of the main tank (white section)
6)bottom of the main tank (below the middle blue section)
The pre-production pack has 8 symbols:
Same 6 as above plus one each on the blue section right below the left and right tank tops.
On the AoSW there are only 3 symbols: the first 3 on the list.
It also looks like there are a lot of differences between the symbols on each, some slight others major.
Should I go with the MoM pics?
What's the consensus?
. . .Jango's, that's another story![]()
Like, these ones???
![]()
These symbols pic are for the Boba Fett Jet Pack, and this stickers pic came originally like that, kind of fuzzy and somehow unreadable (so, don't blame me now for that). This will give an idea to everyone of what we're talking about.
BTW, this is NOT a VashDStampede's version, that's why we're looking forward from him to improve them.
Robert
chaucer44 wrote:
GUYS - these are a very poor copy from the file I created about 2 years ago in adobe. Never thought you could recast graphics.
I don't understand why people don't come to the source for these graphics (I have a drawer full of them) and why someone would feel the need to directly lift them.
[