Urami
Hunter
There are thousands of posts on this site. Lord knows that many topics have repeat threads etc, and this one is no exception. In all of the how to posts I have researched I have come away with a few rules and also a few hints on the actuality of the ESB/ROTJ belt mystery. Is it still a mystery? At this point if someone knows of a thread that has already pointed out what I am about to explain please share. In any case I am happy to just contribute to the forum in some way and possibly a final factual find on how to ESB Belt. At least maybe it will strike up a good conversation.
Belt findings and Clues
1. Color: Some say they are both the same belt (Red with Brown tones) but that it looks less red in ESB because of the Blue filter they used when filming. Some say that the ESB is more Brown with a hint of Red.
2. Strapping: Rule of thumb I have picked up is that the nylon straps get sewn to the right buckle for ROTJ and onto the left for ESB then latched into the oppisate buckle.
Costume History and Re use
1. ESB recycled for ROTJ: It is safe to say that it is widely accepted that most if not all of the soft parts were recycled for ROTJ and that they were just faded from use etc. The armor was re used and re painted as well.
Why wouldn't they have recycled the belt too?
That question is the basis of this post. Look at the below picture and the mini diagram I tried to lay out. I believe that the ESB belt is sewn in the same spot as the ROTJ because its the same exact belt. The difference is the fact that they just trimmed the strap so it only buckled onto the left side. The slack that still exists on the ESB belt is actually sewn on the right buckle (as depicted below from the exhibit close up), wraps under the left buckle tucks in between the girth and buckle and travels all the way back to it origin wrapping back under the bar (where its sewn) buckling and tucking under the girth belt.

If you notice the top strap it looks a little wider in the middle? That is between its two pieces appearing as one. If the picture isn't enough watch the video of how I unstrap my belt that should support the words I wrote better. Also take a look at the still pic as well, I tried to position everything exactly.

I am really interested to know what you guys think? Is this new? Or is this old news just being re-confirmed?
Belt findings and Clues
1. Color: Some say they are both the same belt (Red with Brown tones) but that it looks less red in ESB because of the Blue filter they used when filming. Some say that the ESB is more Brown with a hint of Red.
2. Strapping: Rule of thumb I have picked up is that the nylon straps get sewn to the right buckle for ROTJ and onto the left for ESB then latched into the oppisate buckle.
Costume History and Re use
1. ESB recycled for ROTJ: It is safe to say that it is widely accepted that most if not all of the soft parts were recycled for ROTJ and that they were just faded from use etc. The armor was re used and re painted as well.
Why wouldn't they have recycled the belt too?
That question is the basis of this post. Look at the below picture and the mini diagram I tried to lay out. I believe that the ESB belt is sewn in the same spot as the ROTJ because its the same exact belt. The difference is the fact that they just trimmed the strap so it only buckled onto the left side. The slack that still exists on the ESB belt is actually sewn on the right buckle (as depicted below from the exhibit close up), wraps under the left buckle tucks in between the girth and buckle and travels all the way back to it origin wrapping back under the bar (where its sewn) buckling and tucking under the girth belt.

If you notice the top strap it looks a little wider in the middle? That is between its two pieces appearing as one. If the picture isn't enough watch the video of how I unstrap my belt that should support the words I wrote better. Also take a look at the still pic as well, I tried to position everything exactly.

I am really interested to know what you guys think? Is this new? Or is this old news just being re-confirmed?
Last edited by a moderator: