Reply to thread

Message

the thickness did catch my eye, but goign back to my good ole rubies I noticed that on that bucket, it WAS quite thick :

[ATTACH=full]101414[/ATTACH]

it does look thinner on the ref pic's, but not by much

wow didnt realise abt the 3 rectangles. thought they were too symmetrical and persistent just to be 'accidents'

[QUOTE="Heatshock, post: 221218, member: 2916"] the thickness did catch my eye, but goign back to my good ole rubies I noticed that on that bucket, it WAS quite thick : [ATTACH=full]101414[/ATTACH] it does look thinner on the ref pic's, but not by much wow didnt realise abt the 3 rectangles. thought they were too symmetrical and persistent just to be 'accidents' [/QUOTE]

This thread is more than 9 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

This thread hasn't been active in some time. A new post in this thread might not contribute constructively to this discussion after so long.

If you wish to reply despite these issues, check the box below before replying.
Be aware that malicious compliance may result in more severe penalties.

I am aware that replying to this thread may be considered spam, but I still want to make a reply.

Verification