Okay then, simmer down everyone.
Let me put forth some suggestions as to why I think the boot is def a found part. I know a few of you have talked to the original prop builders (or at least, have for the helmet), so I would love to hear your thoughts.
First off, let's talk about what I'm going to call the 'ear flaps'. The parts on either side of the boot that probably stretch a bit. Two things pop-out at me about this section, first... the fabric weave changes directions and goes horizontal at the top. This is done on some of the chelsea boots to make them more durable, and so you don't get that stretched-out 'baconing' effect at the top. Also, this section is double stitched around the edges for durability.
These two points stand out at me as 'production shoe' and not 'quick prop'. These details, as well as the back-heel flap (to make it easier to pull on) have no need to be there in a non-production prop.
The last detail that I would suggest is indicative of a production item and not a prop, is the toe. This boot as a very clean, square toe. Now, I'm no shoe/boot expert, but EVERYONE I've spoken too says Chelsea boots and notoriously difficult to make... and make well. Why would the prop builders choose a difficult boot style to produce when (a) no one will ever notice, and (b) there are MANY chelsea's easily available?
Below are images of (obviously) the fett boot, highlighting the points I'm talking about, and vintage (70's I believe) chelsea showing the same details. What do you guys think??
[ATTACH]28147[/ATTACH][ATTACH]28148[/ATTACH]
