BobaFettSlave1
Active Hunter
ok. there still seems to be some debate out there on weather the flash tube was a Heiland, or a MPP. this thread will be dedicated to putting an end to the debate.
this is a photo comarison ive made of why I beleave the MPP to be correct. ive numbered the key things that in my mind show that its a mpp. #1 is the hole from the rivet that holds the nameplate Microflash on #2 i beleave you can faintly see the top of the E on the flash. and #3 is another larger hole thats on an MPP. the B on the top of the larger hole is just to faint for me to claim you can see it.
i dont own a heiland so i cant do comparison shots of one of those. PLZ FEEL FREE TO ADD SOME!!!!! but Every Heiland ive come across has the wrong hole configuration or is missing the name plaque rivet holes. pluss theres the fact that the name Heiland is streached across every flash ive seen and not in one ESB shot have i seen this name on the flash.
so feel free to post your opinions on the flash you perfer & why here. plz provide photo evidence if you can
this is a photo comarison ive made of why I beleave the MPP to be correct. ive numbered the key things that in my mind show that its a mpp. #1 is the hole from the rivet that holds the nameplate Microflash on #2 i beleave you can faintly see the top of the E on the flash. and #3 is another larger hole thats on an MPP. the B on the top of the larger hole is just to faint for me to claim you can see it.
i dont own a heiland so i cant do comparison shots of one of those. PLZ FEEL FREE TO ADD SOME!!!!! but Every Heiland ive come across has the wrong hole configuration or is missing the name plaque rivet holes. pluss theres the fact that the name Heiland is streached across every flash ive seen and not in one ESB shot have i seen this name on the flash.
so feel free to post your opinions on the flash you perfer & why here. plz provide photo evidence if you can
Last edited by a moderator: