Jango_Fett_Jr said:Why vote for changes, shouldn't they all be done rather than choosing which are most important?
MandalorFett said:Got Maul, you're still intense dude! Your avatar belies your deep addiction to making some of the most accurate costumes known in the galaxy!
(You're one of the people that makes this site so great man)!
Got Maul,Got Maul said:
webchief said:If I could chime in here... I don't own an MLC pack but from what I've seen about them the details are lacking on the thrusters... even on the proposed revisions. If anyone has seen the MB2 pack I think his resin parts are a HUGE upgrade to the MLC ones. If Mardon could come closer to MBs detail pieces I think he'd have the absolute perfect jet pack!
Jango's kid said:Thats a great bunch of comparison shots you put together there GM. One thing that always bothered me about the MLC, (other than the rocket & thrusters) is the overall shape of the backside of the pack, meaning... the side that has the attachment hooks with the big "hump". I dunno if this is being adressed yet or not, but don't see that particular area mentioned in GMs page. Anyway, the old MLC pack is very flat. You can see by some of GMs pics, that the whole backside of the original pack is kinda dish shaped...so it kinda conforms to your back a bit. Also, I'd like to see the "hump" be larger & thicker like the original. You can really see the difference in the side by side profile pics of the pack that GM has posted. Am I nuts, or has anyone else noticed this????
SEEKER said:I'm glad your accepting request. Hopefully everything could be possible. we could finally have the best jet pack around. it is now, but we're always looking for accuracy.
Turo