NEW MR FETT HELMET PICS

Hi guys,
Just wanted to ask about something concerning the left mandible. I saw a pic on another board that was at an angle close to Spidey's 16th picture. There seemed to be an extra "layer" inside the mandible, slightly inset. It didn't seem to be on the right mandible.
What do you suppose the reason would be to build it that way? Might it have something to do with structural integrity somehow? Could it affect the way the left mandible "toes in" at the bottom?
Just seems like a weird feature to include.

I see what your saying, I think it was their way of making the visor appear even, and some what sealed in a weird way..

Oh yes, the inset layer is on both sides, I can see it in the pics..
 
'the most accurate,' but this had the potential to be one of the best ones, and massed produced at the same time. No other company has made such quality SW replicas.

I completely agree, MR had the potential to use the right helmet to begin with...and normally I wouldn't think too much about this whole MR thing, cause once I found out it wasn't the Hero, I was out...early.
BUT...after seeing the work they did on this helmet, WHICH is REALLY MILES better than what I thought they were going to do, they really had an oppertunity here......and could have made the "end all be all" helmet........oh well. :facepalm
 
I see what your saying, I think it was their way of making the visor appear even, and some what sealed in a weird way..

Oh yes, the inset layer is on both sides, I can see it in the pics..

I have more pictures, I'll post them tonight...;)
Its just something THEY added to make the visor flush... wasn't needed, but doesn't hender it either...if that makes sense.
 
WOW....great info Lee...I never knew all this stuff

you are the man!!(y)(y)(y)

I am SO glad to see you posting

hope to see you in Dallas for the Bulloch project!!:cheers:cheers





Hey, in the scheme of all this don't let your brain confuse the eyes (what I mean is your eyes aren't lying). The ESB was damaged and repaired so it is definitely although very slightly different. The backend cracked out and was repaired this repair caused the 1/8" or so increased flare out. It was repaired with epoxy putty and you can see it in some photos. Two out of 6 helmets produced were also vacuformed possibly for stunt use and those could actually appear larger as well. Also, the eyeslot cracks near the outward edge of each eye was caused by too much pressure exerted by the chinstrap and that is why they were removed.

I guess the easiest litmus test for actually determing the flare out is the more you flare it out the more stalk angle it creates if that makes sense. So if you are happy with the flare you create and not ok with the stalk angling inward then you have too much flare. Hope this makes sense and may put to rest how much flare is needed.

Back to the cave.

Lee
 
Not sure how you can say that?? pictures show otherwise.......just saying they're not Identical now.
Spideyfett,
Not mincing words however, I used the term "almost" identical, not identical. When putting the two side by side they can be confused by all but the most anally retentive..... well all but those on this web site...:)

Can someone post a comparison of MR, PP3 and ESH?
 
Spideyfett,
Not mincing words however, I used the term "almost" identical, not identical. When putting the two side by side they can be confused by all but the most anally retentive..... well all but those on this web site...:)

Can someone post a comparison of MR, PP3 and ESH?

Sorry if that came across harsh..my bad..:)..but I get what you're saying.(y)..

and I don't think that there are any good shots of the PP3???, at least any that have been shared...;)...I asked for some, but nothing yet...

good Idea though(y)
 
Sorry if that came across harsh..my bad..:).
Spidey,
Dude, my skin is so thick I didn't even notice..:D Off subject, but I miss Texas, stationed there for a few years.

I did get my MR yesterday and absolutely love it. Wife says I need to part with the Don Post Deluxe, any takers all paperwork
$600 w/shipping OBO?
Mike
 
Funny that this has come up as Tyler and I were talking today about the perceptions people have and the misperceptions perhaps we helped create. I used to be of the opinion that all the helmets were quite unique with the ESB being the most different of the group. However, over the years I have come to see that the helmets have a LOT more in common than they have differences. I think for so long there has been this deep seated myth that the ESB is so much wider and has so much more (I cringe to use the word) flair that we have begun to see things or more accurately exaggerate things that ARE there but aren't there nearly to the degree that we perceive in our heads. I think in a desire to do what we do, hash out the most trivial details, we have gotten to a point where we blow very very very small details out of proportion. For me and my beliefs, I think ALL of the known real Fett helmets were cast at the same time, probably from a single mold. I think, as with any cast piece that there were minor variations in the cast that may have become more prevalent when the center visor was cut out. However, I truly think that sculpting a helmet specifically to be ONE of the helmets is something of a mistake. I believe with the slightest mods, any good helmet could be made to represent any of the original helmets... but... that is just me.
 
Below is a comparison of the ESB hero at taken at AOSW and the PP3 helmet scanned by MR.

No photos two will look exactly the same due to focal length and camera differences, but the comparison shows there is very little structural difference between the two helmets. Note: the ESB helmet is at a slight downward angle compared to the PP3

Also, the colors look slightly different because the ESB helmet was under dim yellow lighting while the the PP3 was under brighter less harsh lighting; the colors are probably identical in person.

esb-pp3-comp.jpg
 
It's so wild that the ESB helmet's paintjob was obviously copied very closely from the PP3.
If they did that, it seems that the PP3 was the one that was "approved" for use in the movie. So why would they have gone to the considerable trouble of painting another one in a nearly identical manner? Maybe the PP3 wasn't built to "hero" specifications materials-wise?
 
Actually, the PP3's construction is a little cleaner compared to the ESB hero.

It has all the internals of a production helmet: chin strap, working leds, ect... so I don't know of any physical reasons why one helmet was chosen over another. Perhaps it was just a blind choice.
 
It's so wild that the ESB helmet's paintjob was obviously copied very closely from the PP3.

Absolutely! Except, I don't think we know for sure if the PP3 came before the ESB. For the longest time, we thought the ROTJ helmet was made after the ESB, and now know that is not the case. The chronology of the ESB and PP3 helmets could change as well.


If they did that, it seems that the PP3 was the one that was "approved" for use in the movie. So why would they have gone to the considerable trouble of painting another one in a nearly identical manner?

I don't have any facts to back this up, but reason implies that they would have made a backup in case the production used helmet broke, got lost/stolen ect... Most FX crews aren't going to risk stopping production because they had only one "film-ready" helmet.
 
Well, I don't know a lot about the production chronology, but it stands to reason that once one was approved (either the PP3 or ESB Hero) the other was painted up immediately afterwards.
It must have been like some of us do, except instead of copying the details from pictures, they were copying from another helmet! :)
 
These were posted by BanditJedi at the MR forums... Hope he doesn't mind me rehosting them, but these 2 would come in handy for those of us that haven't received ours yet.

DP95 and MR

img0864avy9.gif


RF pic

img0884ajk7.gif
 
Ahahahaha!

Check this pic and you can see my contribution to the MR helmet. Take a close look at the top of the large chip on the MQ-1 board. See those two little upright scratches on the top righthand side?? Remind you of anything?

I etched those into my MQ-1 before sending it to MR to be cast for the helmet. I'll have to dig it out and take a pic to show the matching marks. While it is a small thing, I am pretty tickled to see a piece I found is also a piece I supplied for a helmet that is being enjoyed by so many. OK, enough ego stroking. :D:D

i19540_MR7.jpg
 
Well, I don't know a lot about the production chronology, but it stands to reason that once one was approved (either the PP3 or ESB Hero) the other was painted up immediately afterwards.
It must have been like some of us do, except instead of copying the details from pictures, they were copying from another helmet! :)

No they actually painted the changes in China from photos.
 
This thread is more than 16 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. This thread hasn't been active in some time. A new post in this thread might not contribute constructively to this discussion after so long.
If you wish to reply despite these issues, check the box below before replying.
Be aware that malicious compliance may result in more severe penalties.
Back
Top