Sideshow Life-Size Fett

I'm actually very surprised there isn't more info about it here considering the fact that, according to Facebook, "there was assistance from a number of members from TDH" in making this.
 
The Jango bust came out looking pretty good, minus the hefty $800 price tag
400120_press01-001.jpg

400120_press02-001.jpg

400120_press03-001.jpg
 
I agree, the Jango bust is nice, but the Darth Vader is way better. The level of detail on itis awesome, too bad its $1200.
 
I've been waiting forever for them to release more info on their lifesize HIC they premiered on comicon a year ago...
I hope this one DO becomes a reality.....
 
the Jango is not even a screen accurate helmet, it has a wrong ear and RF on it.......and there is no gap between the shoulder and back armor.
 
I bet they will not be cheap. It would be awesome if SS would do more than a 4 payment plan for them, but I am sure they won't.
 
The full size Fett looks ridiculous. I know it's a prototype but the armor is way too small and the mannequin looks too skinny. The jango bust could be made by most people on this drum in a few days and come out better IMO. I know that sideshow will never come close to the detail we all aspire to but ****, just visit this site and get a little more info on a product you intend to distribute for thousands of dollars.
 
The full size Fett looks ridiculous. I know it's a prototype but the armor is way too small and the mannequin looks too skinny.

I dont think the armor is too small, just a few small areas arent the right ratios I think. The FP V3 armor even though it looks very good, is a bit large. The FP V2 was better in size but needed a bit more shape to it IMO.
I think the sideshow armor is fine. Something just doesnt sit well with me about the overall look. Maybe the pose? Still, I think its an excellent effort and succeeds in accuracy where some fan suits miss it. Some members have done good work on it!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread is more than 9 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. This thread hasn't been active in some time. A new post in this thread might not contribute constructively to this discussion after so long.
If you wish to reply despite these issues, check the box below before replying.
Be aware that malicious compliance may result in more severe penalties.
Back
Top