Jet Pack Size?

Maximillian

New Hunter
Jetpack Size?

:confusedI'm a new member and was wondering how big a jet pack should be for someone about 6.1 and 180 pounds?
I understand that there is no "right"size but was wondering how big it should be to get the same proportion as the movie.
Dose anyone know how tall Boba was in ROTJ or how much he weighed.
On a side note i do have the amazing blueprints from wizzard of flight but when I made a mock up out of paper it seemed to small for me.
Any (more) help or measurements for a jet pack would be very helpful thank you.
 
Jeremy Bulloch was 1.83m (6'1"). Not sure on the weight.

I'm 1.75m tall (5'9"), my jet pack is a scratch build though, I can't help you there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am about 6' 2"; 220 lbs. My jet pack measures a vertical distance of 30" from the tip of the rocket to the base of the thrusters. This is OK, but for my height it may be about an inch less than what I'd like it to be.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can tell you tomorrow I just got the new MLC2 pack in and I will measure it when I get home in the morning and post it up tomorrow night.

I will say I am 6'1 200ish lbs and the MLC pack looks good on me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
not to complain but dose anyone have pics w/ measurements or dose anyone know how to print the WOF patterns with a 1 inch grid. I'm having a hard time getting the size right. Also for the most part are people making the rockets from sheet plastic?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
not to complain but dose anyone have pics w/ measurements or dose anyone know how to print the WOF patterns with a 1 inch grid. I'm having a hard time getting the size right. Also for the most part are people making the rockets from sheet plastic?



there should be a new download of WOF's templates. The new ones are all correctly sized for 8 1/2 by 11 paper sheets. so there is no more fuss with printing them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread is more than 17 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. This thread hasn't been active in some time. A new post in this thread might not contribute constructively to this discussion after so long.
If you wish to reply despite these issues, check the box below before replying.
Be aware that malicious compliance may result in more severe penalties.
Back
Top